Why do Samsung cell phones have such a mediocre “fast” load?

I do not use the Samsung mobile phone, but I think that those who use the galaxy on their day and try, say, the real GT 7 Pro, like the one that I use daily, they will agree that Samsung should improve the speed of the load of their smartphones. And, by the way, the ability of their batteries. A few years ago I used the Galaxy A50, it came from the use of Nexus, and one user interface seemed to me the best experience android after what Google himself did. I know that the galaxy is still excellent, that photographic experience is one of the best in the market, and that their designs are incredible, Go, Samsung is a reliable brand. That’s why I don’t know why Samsung cell phones have such a mediocre “fast” load.

I explain: look at the technical file Galaxy S25 UltraIN Mobile phone about 1100 US dollarsThe field wherever you see this, it has the best of the best, with the exception of the load speed and battery capacity. I compare this to my Realme in the amount of 800 euros. Yes, the experience of the camera exceeds in Ultra Galaxy S25, but they have exactly the same processor, and in order to be interested in this article, the ability of the battery and the speed of load are surprisingly different between one and the other. Ultra Galaxy S25 has a 5,000 mAh battery with 45 watts of a “fast” load, while Realme GT 7 Pro has a 6,500 mAC battery with a fast charge of 120 watts. This, in real use, is transferred to wearing my mobile phone for five or ten minutes, let me leave home again, without fear that the battery is not afraid.

Why do Samsung cell phones have such a mediocre “fast” load?

Honestly, only Samsung knows this, and, of course, they would not call 45 watts of the fast charge of Ultra Galaxy S25 mediocre. However, the blog Summobileclosely related to Samsung, There is an opinion of an article thatIt seems to me that this explains the samsung pose more or less.

Generally speaking, the article says that, unlike Chinese companies, such as Realme, OnePlus or Xiaomi, Samsung does not need “absurd” boot speeds, such as 240 watts that have reached real with its GT 5 Neo. I would not call an “absurd” with a quick charge of 240 watts, perhaps I would use “exaggerated”, but, from my point of view of use, fast exercises are practical advantages and in itself is not an absurd characteristic.

So why do Samsung enthusiasts say that South Korean does not need an “absurd” load? Well, his argument lies in the fact that the presence of a load speed that does not receive an absurdity helps to extend the battery life. Honestly, they are right. The loading of the battery quickly causes voltage, which usually reduces its duration, so some manufacturers slows down the load speed when it reaches 80% or even includes options to limit the load up to 80 percent.

To strengthen your argument in Summobile They say that Samsung seeks to preserve your galaxy for several years, four in accordance with the policy of updates of the operating system – SEI since 2025, according to the policy of the new Galaxy A., of course, they have a moment, but 45 W is the best charging that can offer a phone in the amount of $ 1,100?

And in the event that the Samsung quick charging policy is the best to maintain the quality of the device, how to explain that the Galaxy A56, the middle -will be a stronger load than the Stellar Galaxy S25?