Great Britain was a pioneer country in everything related to the development of cosmetic products made without violence made with love. That is, it does 25 years, was one of the first countries to ban animal testing of products and their ingredients. However, it is currently preparing to take a step back and re-include these types of methods in some contexts.

In fact, they are not the only ones, since the recent decision of its Supreme Court is in accordance with regulations European Chemicals and Mixtures Agency (ECHA). This proclaimed in 2020 the r seriesrules for registration, evaluation, authorization and restriction of chemicals (REACH) on makeup ingredients in 2020, which companies were forced to test on animals to ensure the health of workers.

Logically, this caused a stir both on the part of animal associations and cosmetic companies themselves, who do not consider this measure necessary. There was also dissatisfaction among the population, as more and more people refuse to use cosmetics that do not meet the requirements. made without violence made with love. For this reason, ECHA itself has already looked for alternatives. in silico so as not to test on animals. They have shown that this is not necessary, but the UK is continuing with its new solution.

History of cosmetics testing on animals

In 1944 toxicologists John H. Draize and Jacob M. Spines developed Draize testthe purpose of which was to test the toxicity of a particular substance before directing it to human consumption for cosmetic or pharmaceutical purposes.

For this, 0.5 ml or 0.5 g of the analyte was taken, applied to the eye or shaved skin of a rabbit, and left there for a certain time. After that, it was washed and checked for any contamination. irritation in an animal.

Over time, this test began to receive a lot of criticism, both for being too cruel to animals and for not being effective enough. At the same time, other tests began to be carried out, each more cruel than the last. from feed pregnant mice or rabbits with the substance in question and sacrificing them to see the effect on their fetus, exposing animals to the substance and sacrificing them to see how it is distributed through their organs.

All of this has attracted more and more criticism, because of which alternatives that are free from cruelty to animals (made without violence made with love).

Product Growth made without violence made with love

It is estimated that there are 15,000 ingredients that have already been tested and are known to safe for use in cosmetics. They may have been tested by cruel methods in their time, but the important thing is that it is no longer necessary to continue testing them.

Thanks to this, products can be born made without violence made with love. The UK was one of the first countries to ban animal testing, but over time they have been joined European Union, Mexico, Colombia, Norway and Israel, among others.

For some time there was a problem with countries such as China, as they required any product sold there to be tested on animals first. This meant that many European brands could not be considered made without violence made with love, since for sale in China they agreed to conduct these tests. Fortunately, this requirement no longer exists in an Asian country, so most European brands do not conduct any animal testing.

But after that came another problem. Many laboratories wanted to test new ingredients beyond this list of 15,000. For this reason, the European Union itself, through ECHA, agreed to test some ingredients again on animals. It spawned big commotionwhich had a quick response as ECHA itself began to explore very interesting alternatives.

Pablo Martinez (Unsplash)

Proof in silico to avoid cruelty to animals

ECHA has consistently insisted that animal testing be the last resort. There are already very efficient alternatives for analysis acute and short-term effectsHow eye irritation or skin sensitization. However, they emphasize that these tests may still be needed to analyze effects in the medium or long term, such as reproductive.

However, they are also working to find alternatives. in silico. This is the term used to refer to computer modelling chemical molecules or habitat. Tasks have been developed to look for the pharmacological effects of certain substances, as well as to see how they interact with others or what possible adverse effects they may have on human health. Artificial leather is even being printed to test the effects of new ingredients.

It is clear that artificial intelligence has something to say. Why don’t you rise Great Britain for this car?

Great Britain will be no more made without violence made with love

So far, the British measure has already led to Cruelty Free InternationalThe release a letter condemning the decision from over 80 beauty brands.

However, despite measures already being explored in Europe, English government he plans to continue with the measure, which they insist is perfectly legal.

Times change, but sometimes it seems that instead of going forward, we are going backwards.

Source: Hiper Textual

Previous articleWhy you shouldn’t have sex after giving birth in Russia13:26 | 09 May 2023
Next articleTwitter will start deleting inactive accounts


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here