The research team collected Twitter posts discussing various scientific topics and found that GPT-3 tweets were virtually indistinguishable from human content. The aim of the study was to determine whether people could distinguish human-written tweets from GPT-3 generated tweets. Participants showed higher levels of confidence in GPT-3 regardless of the accuracy of the information provided.

However, the study acknowledges some limitations, such as participants rating tweets out of context and unable to view profiles to assess authenticity. Overall, the study highlights the need to improve training datasets to effectively combat disinformation campaigns.

Source: Ferra

Previous article11 foods that will make you constipatedFitness and health13:13 | 29 June 2023
Next articleScientists from Russia discovered the ability to extract silver from effluent in baker’s yeastScience and technology13:31 | 29 June 2023
I am a professional journalist and content creator with extensive experience writing for news websites. I currently work as an author at Gadget Onus, where I specialize in covering hot news topics. My written pieces have been published on some of the biggest media outlets around the world, including The Guardian and BBC News.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here