This decision, which contained misinformation, was submitted to the National Council of Justice (CNJ).
Based on ChatGPT data, Rodriguez included non-existent and illogical details in his decision. AI specifically cited non-existent decisions of the Supreme Court.
This misuse of AI in legal decision-making has prompted the CNJ to consider regulating the use of such technologies in the judicial system.
This case is not isolated. In May 2023, American lawyer Stephen Schwartz also fell victim to disinformation from ChatGPT.
Schwartz used artificial intelligence to unknowingly prepare legal documents containing false information for a hearing, which were then filed in court.
Source: Ferra
I am a professional journalist and content creator with extensive experience writing for news websites. I currently work as an author at Gadget Onus, where I specialize in covering hot news topics. My written pieces have been published on some of the biggest media outlets around the world, including The Guardian and BBC News.
