The authors have found that most people work for the “prejudice of truth olan, which is a tendency to think correctly, if there is no sign of a significant sign of fraud. Even when the participants in the experiment said that half of the investigations were fake directly, they still took the majority for the real ones.
In addition, it turned out that people trusted more negative investigations, but in practice they were more often fake.
Scientists believe that they only want users to complain about suspicious investigations. Instead, the platforms should be more active to identify suspicious content, especially negatively and celebrate independently.
Source: Ferra
I am a professional journalist and content creator with extensive experience writing for news websites. I currently work as an author at Gadget Onus, where I specialize in covering hot news topics. My written pieces have been published on some of the biggest media outlets around the world, including The Guardian and BBC News.
