Which is better for the brain? ¿Write manually or computer? For a long time it was said that it is better to write manually. In fact, students are usually recommended to write manually during training in order to better save information. However, up to a year ago, everything that was nothing more than a hypothesis, without many scientific research, to support them. Everything has changed with the Norwegian study that created a great revolution. This was finally demonstrated: to write by manual wins in the press on the computer. Or so we believed; Well, now two scientists have published a study in which there is so much about what to talk about.
This is about Svetlana pinet, Basque basis for science and Marike Longkamp, From the University of Marseille. When analyzing the methodology of the latest research or machine, they found enough restrictions in their methodology, for which they do not see the appropriate for extracting such stupid results.
This does not mean that manually writing is worse than doing it on a computer. Just the methods with which they tried to demonstrate their superiority are not quite suitable.
How was the study of 2024 on manual work or car?
Norwegian studies were conducted with University students what is connected to the car Encephalogram When writing a series of words manually or machine. Encephalogram is a method used for Measure the electrical activity of the brainIn this case, it was clear that when students wrote manually, they forged More complex brain bondsWith a large number of electrical impulses. The formation of this type of compounds is necessary in education. Thus, the authors of the study came to the conclusion that the management of additional information at the same time made it possible to create a stronger connection model.
With additional information, they referred to the fact that when writing manually Visual information How Proviacocation. That is, the location of various parts of the body, in this case, the hand relative to the paper and its controlled movement. In the study, the authors came to the conclusion that this could be useful for everyone, but, first of all, for children.
Restrictions in the study
With a thorough analysis of the study by Pinet and LongCamp, several restrictions were found. The first is that the study was conducted with Young people Thus, you cannot be so easily extrapolate for children.
On the other hand, the study was not involved No training. Volunteers had to write the words that they already knew, and they did not ask them to remember them or something like that.
In addition, how they processed two types of letters, was very different from how it was done outside the laboratory. For example, to better measure their movements when manually writing, they were asked did not raise the digital pen The tablet that was provided for the case.
As for computer writing, they had to do this with One finger. Obviously, this is a very uncomfortable way of writing, which has nothing to do with what most people do when you are faced with a computer keyboard or a typewriter. Writing, manually or machine, is usually an automatic act. However, in this case, the automatic part of the writer was eliminated. I need to think more about finding keys and an attempt to have speed, and this can affect how the scripture of the brain. It is true that there are talk about the advantages of processing visual information and proprioception when manually writing, but all this additional information is also automated.
So, manually writing is not so good?
Both Pinet and LongCamp have always insisted on Manually writing is very useful. They do not remove the importance, but insist that this study is not enough to place it over the computer on the computer. You can’t even show that this is really better for the brain.
Given these statements, one of the authors of the Norwegian study recognized that they were supposed to include some type of training in the methodology. As explained in IflscienceHe assured that his team has already launched a study with adolescents, which analyzes the ability to study when writing manually or machine.
As if this was not enough, she criticized the kick and Longamp, because she notes that two authors of the new article defend Using keyboards in educationSo that they can have hidden interests. Of course, the dispute is served. Additional studies will be required so that we can finally get an answer. Although now we can conclude the only thing that we can conclude that there is no method of victory and other loser. Everyone has their own advantages. This is not a question of white or blacks, but pay attention to a gray scale.
Source: Hiper Textual
